aigw
← Back

aigw vs AWS Route 53

Honest comparison. Where Route 53 is the right call, where aigw is, and how to choose.

TL;DR

Where Route 53 wins

  • Deep AWS integration. Alias records to ELB, CloudFront, S3, API Gateway. If most of your fleet is AWS, alias records save you from updating IPs every time a load balancer scales out.
  • IAM + CloudFormation + Terraform. Your existing AWS access controls cover DNS. If you have a strict IAM story, that's one less system to integrate.
  • Brand familiarity. Procurement signs off without asking questions. Compliance auditors don't blink. Not a technical reason but a real one.
  • Resolver service. Route 53 Resolver and Resolver DNS Firewall sit on the recursive-resolver side of DNS. aigw is authoritative only. If you need internal-VPC resolution, you're using Route 53 Resolver alongside whatever authoritative service you pick.

Where aigw wins

  • Multi-cloud GSLB by design. Health-checked POOL records (weighted or active-passive) and per-continent GEO records route to any target IP, anywhere. Fail over from your AWS deployment to GCP or to your own colo. Route 53's clever routing types favor AWS targets through alias records; everything else gets a plain A record with a health check tacked on.
  • Flat pricing, no per-query surprise. aigw includes generous query volume per plan. Route 53 charges $0.40 per million queries plus per-zone fees plus per-health-check fees plus per-traffic-policy fees. A small SaaS doing 50M queries/month + a handful of failover policies pays roughly 4 to 8 times more on Route 53 than on aigw Pro.
  • Observability that belongs to you. Per-zone query insights, p50/p95/p99 latency, top names, country breakdowns. All included. Equivalent visibility on Route 53 means Route 53 Resolver Query Logging into CloudWatch into Athena, billed separately.
  • Hijack monitor. aigw probes your zone from public resolvers every five minutes and alerts you if anyone is returning answers that don't match. Catches registrar compromise, route hijacks, and resolver injection. Route 53 has no equivalent.
  • Per-zone query firewall. Refuse queries by source IP, country, or query type. Stops ANY/AXFR amplification and locks internal zones to corp ranges. Route 53 has nothing here. You'd put CloudFront or a WAF in front, except DNS doesn't work that way.

Side by side

Feature Route 53 aigw
Authoritative DNSYesYes
Anycast networkGlobal, 90+ locationsMulti-region (growing)
Failover routingYes (+ health checks billed separately)Yes, included
Weighted routingYesYes
Geo routingGeolocation + GeoproximityGEO (continent/country)
Latency-based routingYes, AWS-region anchoredNo, use geo + health-checked pools
Alias to AWS resourcesYesNo (use CNAME)
Multi-cloud target supportLimited (alias is AWS-only)Native, any IP, any cloud
Query insights / analyticsResolver Query Logging + CloudWatch + AthenaBuilt in per zone
Hijack monitoringNoYes
Per-zone query firewallNoYes (CIDR, country, qtype, rate)
API-key IP allow-listIAM policies (broader)Per-key CIDR allow-list
Terraform providerYes (AWS)Yes
Pricing model$0.50/zone + $0.40/M queries + $0.50/health-check + extrasFlat plan, queries included

Pricing math for a typical SaaS

10 zones, 50M queries/month, 8 failover health checks, 2 geo policies.

Route 53 monthly
  • 10 zones × $0.50 = $5.00
  • 50M queries × $0.40/M = $20.00
  • 8 health checks × $0.50 = $4.00
  • Endpoint health checks (HTTPS) 8 × $0.75 = $6.00
  • Geo / latency traffic policies = ~$50 (per policy record × 50M evaluations)
  • Resolver Query Logging + CloudWatch + Athena = $30+
≈ $115 / month, climbing with queries
aigw Pro
$29 / month flat, 1M queries free, everything else included
$29 / month

Numbers from AWS' published pricing as of Q1 2026. Your bill will vary; we list this so you have a starting point, not a guarantee.

Migrating

We wrote a step-by-step guide for Route 53 specifically. Migrate from Route 53 to aigw with zero downtime covers the TTL pre-cut, parallel zone build, NS delegation flip, and post-migration monitoring. Takes about a day end-to-end, most of which is just waiting on TTLs.

Honest disclosures

  • Route 53 has a much larger anycast network than aigw today. For workloads where p99 DNS latency from every continent must be below 20ms, that matters.
  • Route 53 has DNSSEC signing for any zone. aigw DNSSEC is on the roadmap, not in production yet.
  • Route 53 has been around since 2010 and runs essentially every flagship AWS service's DNS. aigw is a beta-stage product. We dogfood our own DNS but we're not at AWS scale.

Try it

Free plan is real (5 zones, 100k queries/month). No card, no trial-period nag. Sign up at console.aigw.app.